跳至主要内容

Start from a simple fact...

Many people said when the Tibet riot happend, China drove out all the westen media. As far as know, that's not true. Although China stoped given permit to them, China didn't drive all of them out. At least, The economist was there. They got the permit before the riot, and it is proved. They did take photos and make their reports. You can check that on their webpage. But maybe they didn't provide the information the other media wanted, so the other media just started
to use fake photos to support their fake news. (I think if The economist could provide that kind of photos, they would be difinately widely cited.) As a Chinese, I can finger out the Nepal police and Indian police are not Chinese at my first glance. But to the westen people, they may have the same asian faces as we have.


I subsribed Time, Newsweek and some other magazines. I was reading the free online New York Times even when I was in China. I believed these west media were better than Chinese ones like CCTV. Although I read many reports about China with bias, I was thinking they wrote these because they didn't understand China. But their behavor in this Tibert issue totally changed my mind. They might not understand China, but they don't even want to be bothered to try. They just want to put bad names on China. When the terrorists were burning the shops, banks, and even schools, when they were killing both Han Chinese and Tibertan Chinses, the westen media said they are peaceful. When they were attacking the torch holders, even a disable girl in a wheel chair, the westen media said that's for human rights. Doesn't the girl have human right?

When Chinese people went on the streets to protect the torch, the westen media said they are employed by Chinese government. When we have different opinions, they said we are brain washed. However, as a common Chinese, I started to learn westen culture even before I can read, from the Grimm's Fairy Tales, Andersen's Fairy Tales and so on. I started to read novels when I was a 3rd year student in element school. Most of the books I read wre westen classics such as Jane Eyre, Pride and prejudice, Master and Margret ... I can make a long list, including the books such as 1984, Animal Farm, and The Right to Heresy, which some westen people think not be permited to publish in China. I also read westen authors' books about Chinese culture, like Chinese Characteristics by Arthur H. Smith, Stephen Owen's books about Chinese poems, and Jonathan D. Spence's books about Chinese history. I started to study English when I was 13 after I entered the middle school. After years of study, I can read books writen in English and posts online in English. And I really did read some. But I wonder how many westen people read Chinese books. Here I means the books writen by Chinese authors, not the books about Chinese but written by westen authors. I wonder how many westen people can read the posts in Chinese forum. If most westen people can only get knowledge about China from their own media, who is brain washed when we are talking about Chinese issues?

Now I feel sorry to CCTVs. Although they are not as good as I expected, they are not worse than their westen counterparts. Maybe I should say they are the same bad. I will keep reading Time and other magazines, because I want to know how the westen people think, or how they are guided to think. But I will not believe them as before.

China is not perfect. Tibertan Chinese, as the same as Han Chinese and all the other races in China, deserve a better life. And we should work hard for this purpose. But it doesen't means the terrorists can burn our cities and kill our peoples by the name of peace, democracy, human rights, or anything else. It doesn't mean westen media can put a bad name on China by fake news.

Finaly let me cite a sentence from others, "Study the history, not the media."

评论

Yan说…
写的很好,支持你!

此博客中的热门博文

I want to learn Emacs

I'm using crimson editor, a good text editor from Korea. It has worked very well for me till now, but it has not been updated since 2004 and recently I found some features that crimson editor does not have,such as code folding, really useful. So I want to switch to a powerful, up-to-date, extendable and cross-platform editor. Between vi and Emacs, I chose the later one. Emacs is not easy to learn, so I just want to learn some basic features firstly. 1. Switch between buffers, buffer and minibuffer, and modes. One does not need to change into a special mode to input the content in Emacs (This is one reason why I did not choose vi), but Emacs does have a minibuffer to take some complected commands from the user. And in Emacs one can have many buffers and each buffer has a mode (not the same "mode" in vi). So have to learn what they are and how to switch between them. 2. Basic editing, such as creat new, open, save, and close file, copy and paste, search and replace ... 3. F...

Dinner party

最近很忙很疲惫。昨天做了一个presentation,下周还有一个。本来这些都应该在二月份做完的,因为我人在多伦多,结果都拖到现在了。还有摘要要提交,还有作业,等等。 昨天晚上我们组的人出去吃了个饭,在一家韩国饭店。虽然是在东方风格的饭店,吃饭的方式却还是西式的。就是各人点自己的菜自己吃。我只叫了一个汤,因为里面有肉,有菜,有豆腐。我可不想叫一盘孜然牛肉,守着他自己一个人吃完。不过这家韩国店的味道一般,没有我在加州时尝过的那家“韩国豆腐”好。以前我室友搬走的时候,也到这家店吃过饭。点的是一份羊肉火锅。味道比这次好些。其实我是很喜欢朝鲜咸菜的。可惜在长春经常吃到的桔梗、蕨菜之类的,这边都没有。只有辣白菜、腌萝卜。这大概是因为缺乏材料的缘故吧。 这次出来吃饭,是因为我老板的生日和我的生日都快到了。我老板的生日就比我早一天。另外还给一个同组的朋友补过生日。我们每人都收到一张生日卡,上面有其他人的祝福。大家都是用自己的母语写的。我只能看懂英语和一点儿日语。(其实日语只能看懂几句。)其他的像德语和俄语就不懂了。上次过生日的时候还有意大利的朋友在,还写了意大利语呢。 都说德国人很严谨,我本来以为德国人都是很严肃的。但是我们组的德国人,包括我老板,都很喜欢开玩笑。说话的时候经常打岔,或者用写夸张的词,要不然就模仿一些搞笑的动作。有时候这给我带来困难。因为我的英语勉强可以理解符合逻辑的对话,一旦超出常规之外,就有些困难了。不过,轻松一点儿的气氛还是不错的。

西红柿蛋汤(转载)

材料: 西红柿两三个,鸡蛋一或二个,葱蒜各一些,油,盐,味精备好 做法: 先拔上几个蒜,然后切成一片片的,再把西红柿切成块,最好是不规则的切,按照不同的方向把西红柿切成块,这样有利于炒出红汁,接着在锅里倒油,多点,将蒜 放入爆锅,放入西红柿翻炒一分钟,直炒到西红柿的皮有些脱,锅里的油变红为止,这时倒入水,水不能特多,煮沸之后,最好再煮一分钟,到满锅红汤不停冒热 气,上面的西红柿无奈挣扎时,将打散的鸡蛋沿着锅的一圈倒入汤中,这样蛋不会粘锅,看到黄色的蛋花浮上表面时,再放入盐和味精,(只是不可将锅中的热汤舀 出荡放鸡蛋的碗,因为这样会浑浊汤),最后在出锅前切些香菜或葱,煮上半分钟,就可以出锅了。 药用: 得口腔溃疡的人大多是缺少维生素,因此想到了一个极其简单但可以狂补维生素的招,就是喝西红柿蛋汤。 原始连接在这里:http://www.laiwu.tv/bbs/xiangxi.asp?id=1315